PART 2 OF 2: BUILDING WITHIN THE ENHANCEMENT CITY

 The second essay clarifying the purpose and considerations when designing within the enhancement city.

BUILDING WITHIN THE ENHANCEMENT CITY

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

HOW DO COMMUNITIES JUST HAPPEN?

       While thinking about "Levittown and America," I'm plagued with a curiosity of how communities originate without third-party force? Often time, particularly in contemporary design, we see community as a sort of goal or a marker of success. "I have created a wonderful, healthy community; therefore, my masterplan is a success," but how much of that is the role of the design? I'm reminded of all the communities I consider myself a part of - from my childhood neighborhood to collections of artists and design organizations. Arguably even my workplace is a community of like-minded individuals in a grand collaboration for the success of the firm. Can communities be designed? Or does it simply require the shared interests and goals that link us together as humans? The desire for unity, acceptance, understanding, and support so that we all feel a little less secluded in the world? What happens when someone cannot or does not wish to partake in any community? Is...
Read more

RACISM, RADICALISM, AND RADISHES: A BRIEF HISTORY OF EVERYTHING

 When it comes to Modernism, people love to hate it - perhaps rightfully so. The entire goal of the movement was a form of universalization and mass production, experimentation and questioning. Particularly in the article about Scandinavian Suburbs where modernism made all sorts of claims and essentially fed segregation and racism...but did it? The article poses the questions "Prevailing ideas about appropriate cures for the disease of modernist urbanism have taken the form of biopsies, amputations, or why not just euthanasia?" (659) However, I have a very hard time believing the modernist designers sat down and designed neighborhoods, houses, and environments with the intent of causing a separation in society. It is always very easy to look at failed experiments and blame the designer for the side effects. I believe the modernists should be given a bit of forgiveness and leeway in their work. Yes, it had horrible consequences, but the intentions were pure. How can we expec...
Read more

TAKING OVER CO-OP CITY

     Why did Co-op City work when other low income housing developments failed so poorly? Perhaps it was the resilience characteristic of every New Yorker - gotta be tough to win the turf war against the rats. However, I don't believe there was much difference between the residents of Co-op City and those of Pruitt-Igoe, both faced similar circumstances and turmoils. Therefore, the culprit has to be the management and development itself. The ability to own property, to work toward a common goal, to open the doors to multiple types of people all chasing their common ground united the residents to care for and take pride in the place they lived. "I want this place to be nice because one day, it will be all mine" as opposed to "I'm only a renter, it's not my responsibility to maintain this place." The development, like much of New York, was experimental but open-minded and did not restrict the residents or attempt to control them.      Even more amazing was...
Read more